Peer Evaluation Forms for Group Work and Presentations

Twelve peer-evaluation form designs cover group checklists, Yes/No presentation feedback, written reflections, and numeric rating scales for any subject.

An educational teaching resource from Roombop entitled 12 Different Peer Evaluation Template (Editable Google Docs) downloadable at Teach Simple.

Grades: Not Grade Specific
File type: Google Docs
Editable: Yes

Updated Apr 19, 2023

Subject: Classroom Management, Resources for Teachers
Topic: Peer, Evaluation
Resource types: Templates, Teacher Tools
Editable: Yes

From the author

About this resource

This is a Peer Evaluation For Group Work, Presentations, Cooperative Tasks, and Team Assignments. This package has 12 different peer evaluation forms for larger groups as well as pairs. You can use these Peer Evaluations in any subject at any level.
Included is a printable PDF file as well as an editable Google Doc.

In the classroom

Teaching tips & learning objectives

Learning objectives

Practice giving structured, criteria-based feedback to a peer or group member across categories like dependability, contribution, and timeliness.
Reflect on and articulate specific strengths, areas for improvement, and lingering questions about a peer's work or presentation.

Teaching tips

Choose the attribute checklist that matches your group size (2, 3, or 4 members), since three separate versions are included.
Use the open-ended '2 things they did well' or '3 things well / 2 learned / 1 still don't know' reflection templates after presentations, when written qualitative feedback is more valuable than a single score.
Pair a numeric rating scale (1-10 or 0-3) with its 'Explain your reasoning' counterpart when you want students to justify a score rather than just circle a number.

Skills covered

Constructive peer feedback — students rate a group member or presenter against specific behaviours such as dependability, punctuality, and fair contribution.
Reflective evaluation — students write specific strengths, areas for improvement, and open questions after observing a peer's work or presentation.
Collaborative self-assessment — students use the partner-rating templates to numerically score a partner's contribution across five defined collaboration behaviours.

Good to know

Questions teachers ask about this resource

How do the 1-10 rating scale templates differ from the 0-3 rating scale templates?

The 1-10 scale only labels its two endpoints ('1 is terrible' and '10 is great'), leaving the numbers in between open to interpretation, while the 0-3 scale labels every point (3 Excellent, 2 Average, 1 Below Average, 0 Unacceptable), giving each score a defined meaning.

Do the three group-size versions of the attribute checklist evaluate different things?

No — all three versions score the same nine attributes (dependable, accepted tasks, contributed positively, completed work on time, helped others, accurate work, fair share, worked well with others, would work with again) on the same 1-3 scale; only the number of group-member columns changes.